We had the distinct pleasure to interview award winning designer about their original and creative design work. is an award-winning creative designer, that makes our world a better place with their original works.
("") answered Design Interview ("DI") questions about their award-winning work . Interview questions prepared by Frank Scott.
: 1x3 is inspired by so called burr puzzles. They are type of mechanical puzzles where all parts are interlocked and stay together without any fixtures. I found them suitable for utilization.
: I wanted to achieve what I call "sophistication free" design. It means a design that can be produced easily and is made of very simple elements and traditional materials. The production in general is getting more and more hi-tech, the details more and more complicated and specific for each manufacturer. I think there is still space for movement in the opposite direction!
: The table is already a product with a special reusable bag, assembly manual etc. I will probably try to use its interlocking principle for other applications.
: It is not easy to give an exact period of time. 1x3 is one of several designs following the same concept that I developed simultaneously. The whole process, from the first sketch to the prototypes, of all those designs, took about an year.
: It was an inspiration. This is always the way for me. I first invent a principle and then decide in which field to apply it. In this case it was furniture design. Before that I was not very interested in product design, mainly in architecture.
: The design has been already produced by my own company called PRAKTRIK. I founded it together with my business partner an year ago particularly for this design and the other pieces I mentioned before. Selling or leasing the production rights is possible.
: I am interested in geometry. I believe that form and materials are critical for the way the objects around us influence us. Symmetry is also something very important to me. I tried to design an object that involves all these and is modern at the same time.
: Not really. I usually try to find inspiration in other fields that are different from architecture and product design. I also avoid watching magazines and blogs while I am working on something; because, it can make me imitate some one else's works.
: Middle class customers for the moment. My dream is to be mass produced and spread but only the time can show if it is appropriate for the majority of people.
: Probably the simplicity in both: geometry and technology. I have seen similar designs, but they are more complicated in the geometry of their notches requiring more complicated technology.
: The name of the design represents its structure. It is a mathematical expression that gives the total number of wooden elements. The first number corresponds to the number of element types. The second one represents the number of elements of each type.
: For the design process I used a 3D CAD software and small models. For the prototypes I bought a special machine called scroll saw which I adapted for this particular purpose.
: Probably the fact that three rectangular sticks can stay stable without the need of any fixtures.
: I designed it by myself, including the first prototype. I worked with professionals in woodworking to develop the complete product. I also worked with graphic designers to develop its visual identity: assembly manual catalogue, reusable bag etc.
: It is not critical for 1x3; because, it can be produced by many ways including very traditional ones but it does not mean that the technology is not important at all. The possibility of using only low-tech was an important part of the concept; as a result, a good table saw is completely enough for the production of the wooden base. The material is also important. It is traditional and proved to be harmless for human health, it is also native for burr puzzles.
: After I saw the potential for utilization of interlocking puzzles I started to examine the existing ones but they appeared to be too complicated and difficult to produce or assemble. Actually my task was just the opposite of the one of a classical puzzle maker; because, I had to design structures that are simple and easy to assemble.
: I had to work in an area that is different from my profession - architecture. The scale is very different. In architecture I design for a particular client, in this case I had to be the client, or at least to imagine what a client would look for.
: Winning a competition was not my goal. Every competition is specific and different and designing a product just for winning a competition at all costs does not make sense to me. I wanted to check if this particular design is interesting to professionals: professors, designers etc.
: Most of the things I learned during the process are related to woodworking. I also had to work with other people to finish the whole product, I learned a lot from them.
