DI: What is the main principle, idea and inspiration behind your design?
ZL : The core principle behind IGO is to redesign urban mobility for equity. Inspired by the real pain points of low-income communities in Los Angeles—especially the commuting barriers for night-shift workers—we aimed to create a solution that makes mobility safer, smarter, and more inclusive. The inspiration came from a mix of real-life interviews and a deep belief that mobility is not just transportation—it is access to opportunity.
DI: What has been your main focus in designing this work? Especially what did you want to achieve?
ZL : Our main focus was inclusive user experience and functional innovation. We wanted to reduce the cognitive burden for tech-novice users, while embedding powerful features like voice-triggered emergency alerts and real-time job discovery. Ultimately, we aimed to empower marginalized communities by giving them safer, smarter and more opportunity-linked commutes.
DI: What are your future plans for this award winning design?
ZL : We plan to further develop IGO into a fully functional app pilot program in partnership with local communities and transportation authorities. The next phase includes AI optimization for job matching and route prediction. We also hope to integrate IGO into city-wide smart infrastructure systems to drive long-term urban equity.
DI: How long did it take you to design this particular concept?
ZL : The concept development and initial design process took approximately four months, from January to April 2023. This included user research, interface prototyping, feature planning, and visual system development.
DI: Why did you design this particular concept? Was this design commissioned or did you decide to pursuit an inspiration?
ZL : This was a self-initiated project based on real community needs. During field research in LA, we observed that car-centric urban planning disproportionately impacted under-resourced groups. IGO was born out of a genuine desire to address this mobility injustice and create a scalable design with social value.
DI: Is your design being produced or used by another company, or do you plan to sell or lease the production rights or do you intent to produce your work yourself?
ZL : IGO is currently an independent concept project. We are actively seeking partnerships with city governments, nonprofit organizations, and urban mobility accelerators to bring it into real-world application. Our aim is not just commercialization, but to ensure it remains accessible, ethical, and community-centered.
DI: What made you design this particular type of work?
ZL : As a designer committed to social impact, I am drawn to projects that serve underrepresented communities. Urban transportation is a field where design can directly affect quality of life. IGO allowed me to explore how intelligent systems and inclusive design can reshape everyday access and equity.
DI: Where there any other designs and/or designers that helped the influence the design of your work?
ZL : IGO’s design was influenced by both urban mobility systems and inclusive product design cases. Works from studios like IDEO and projects like Google’s Next Billion Users initiative inspired our approach to accessibility and tech-simplicity. I was also influenced by service design thinking that emphasizes user journeys and ecosystem mapping.
DI: Who is the target customer for his design?
ZL : The primary users are residents of low-income, carless households in urban areas—especially night-shift workers, elderly passengers, and job-seekers who rely on public transit. IGO is also designed with community-based organizations, city planners, and transit agencies in mind as extended stakeholders.
DI: What sets this design apart from other similar or resembling concepts?
ZL : IGO integrates AI-powered features that go beyond route planning—it includes voice-triggered safety alerts, real-time job listings along travel paths, and a future model for local business integration. Its social mission, paired with a minimalist and human-centered interface, makes it not just a transport app, but a tool for equity and empowerment.
DI: How did you come up with the name for this design? What does it mean?
ZL : The name “IGO” stands for “I Go,” expressing personal agency and movement. It’s short, direct, and universally understood, aligning with the app’s goal to make commuting simple, empowering, and accessible. The name reflects not just movement—but the freedom to choose where and when to go.
DI: Which design tools did you use when you were working on this project?
ZL : I used Figma for interface prototyping, Adobe Illustrator for icon and system visual development, and Photoshop for presentation graphics. For user flow mapping and UX documentation, I relied on Miro and Whimsical. The prototype was also tested using clickable demos via Figma and Maze.
DI: What is the most unique aspect of your design?
ZL : The integration of AI with mobility equity is the most unique aspect of IGO. Features like voice-triggered emergency alerts, real-time job discovery during commutes, and personalized route learning go beyond typical shuttle systems. The design is not only functional—it’s socially intentional.
DI: Who did you collaborate with for this design? Did you work with people with technical / specialized skills?
ZL : Yes. I collaborated with transportation researchers and data analysts to validate route efficiency and target demographics. I also consulted a UX accessibility specialist to ensure the interface meets the needs of elderly and visually impaired users. This was a multidisciplinary design process.
DI: What is the role of technology in this particular design?
ZL : Technology is the core enabler of IGO. AI supports route optimization, job matching, and safety monitoring. Real-time data feeds enable responsive decision-making. Technology in IGO is not ornamental—it’s what makes the service adaptive, inclusive, and efficient.
DI: Is your design influenced by data or analytical research in any way? What kind of research did you conduct for making this design?
ZL : Yes. I conducted 50 surveys and 10 in-depth interviews with residents from low-income communities in Los Angeles. Research revealed common challenges: safety concerns, high costs, and limited access to work. These findings shaped every feature of IGO—from safety alerts to job discovery integration.
DI: What are some of the challenges you faced during the design/realization of your concept?
ZL : One major challenge was balancing simplicity with functionality—ensuring a seamless user experience while offering complex backend AI support. Another was visualizing “intelligence” in a way that feels intuitive, not overwhelming. It took several iterations to achieve this harmony.
DI: How did you decide to submit your design to an international design competition?
ZL : I believe socially impactful design deserves a global platform. Submitting to A’ Design Award was a way to share IGO’s mission and gather validation from an international community of designers, researchers, and innovators. It also opens doors for future collaboration.
DI: What did you learn or how did you improve yourself during the designing of this work?
ZL : I deepened my understanding of human-centered design and how to embed inclusivity at every level—from research to interface to visual tone. I also learned how to communicate complex systems in a clear and emotionally resonant way.
DI: Any other things you would like to cover that have not been covered in these questions?
ZL : I hope IGO can serve as a reference for designing tech with social purpose. Good design is not only about aesthetics—it’s about empathy, systems thinking, and real-world impact. If this project sparks dialogue on equitable mobility, then the design has done its job.